Philosophy Talk’s Fifth Annual Philosophical Summer Reading List
This week, we broadcast our fifth annual summer reading list show. Over the five years…
This week, we broadcast our fifth annual summer reading list show. Over the five years…
Koro is mental disorder, characterized by a debilitating fear that that one’s genitals are retracting into ones body and that once they are fully retracted you will die. You don’t find many instances of in Western societies. But Southwest Asia koro epidemics have been known to break out. There was such an epidemic in 1984-85 in Guangdong, China. And between 997 and 2003 in several different West African nations, there were local outbreaks of koro-like panics.
When one hears the word “apology” in a philosophical context, one naturally thinks of Plato’s famous Socratic dialogue, “The Apology”. And then it strikes one that Socrates doesn’t sound all that apologetic. Historically, “apology” often meant “reasoned argument or writing in justification of something”. Nowadays it mostly means “a regretful acknowledgment of an offense or failure”. It’s in this latter sense we are interested in apologies, including apologies in the political sphere, whether sincere or self-serving statements pretending to be expressions of regret.
How can we know what a person is feeling by looking at their face, and in particular can we know if they are lying? There is clearly both a psychological side to this and an epistemological side. Our guest is famous for his work on the psychological side, with a positive result: we can know what a person is feeling, and whether they are lying; at least the information is often there in the face. But it’s not always so easy.
Is water-boarding torture? If it is, does that make it wrong? Always? Usually? What is torture, and why is it always, usually, or sometimes wrong? Almost every dictionary gives two definitions of torture: a narrow one… inflicting great pain. And a broad one… severe mental anxiety and suffering. Water-boarding clearly counts as torture by the second definition, perhaps the issue isn’t clear given the first definition. But sure if our topic is the ethics, or morality, of torture, we need the more inclusive definition – severe mental anxiety and suffering.
What is a wife? From a philosophical point of view, it looks like the word…
Why focus just on wives? What about husbands? And what about homosexual marriages? Why not be gender-neutral and politically correct? Why not ask: what is a spouse? Beside the fact that it doesn’t have the same ring, our main answer is that neither the category “husband” nor the category “spouse” is as historically, culturally, or philosophically interesting as the category “wife.”
I must not fear. Fear is the mind-killer. Fear is the little-death that brings total…
Satisfy your hunger for food and philosophy on April 25th at the new Marsh Theater location in…
One can imagine a kind of sceptic being put off by this way of setting…
According to the OED, the usual sense of `normal’ is: 2. a. Constituting or conforming…
Joe: I’m not sure I agree with you Blow in denying that nature contains the…
Joe: Hey Blow, I hear that Philosophy Talk is giving out it’s Second Annual Dionysus…
Well, it’s been awhile since we’ve updated our blog. Since both John and Ken are…
To mark the occasion of our 200th episode, we invited three former guests, Brian Leiter, Jenann Ismael, and Martha Nussbaum, and also our listeners to help us come up with a list of the 10 most pressing philosophical issues of the 21st century.
Today our topic is Darwin’s Philosophical Legacy and our guest is the one man in…