We've Been Framed: How Language Shapes Politics

Week of: 
January 14, 2007
What is it: 

Does the hijacking of words by political forces tell us something interesting about the nature of language and meaning?  Would liberals by some other name smell sweeter, or are they really tax-raising, latte-drinking, sushi-eating, Volvo-driving, New York Times-reading, body-piercing, Hollywood-loving, left-wing freaks?  Ken and John welcome back Philosophy Talk favorite Geoff Nunberg, author of The Way We Talk Now and Going Nucular, to explain the ABCs of "talking right."

Listening Notes: 

John and Ken begin the show by discussing the concept of frames and framing in language. Ken describes the history of framing in the study of artificial intelligence and how it has been developed in the philosophy of language. Words become associated with certain frames--for instance, suppose we hear there is a talk about free will by a certain philosopher, and someone asks: Is it an analytic or continental philosopher speaking? Depending on whether they come from an analytic or continental tradition they may associate those words with positive and negative connotations that don't arise from the words themselves, but from the framing of these words. Would you rather lose 48 pounds over 2 years or 2 pounds a month? The framing of the question can determine its answer!

Ken introduces Geoffrey Nunberg, fellow at Stanford and author of the recent book Talking Right. John begins by asking about language in general and what Geoff thinks of the evocative nature of words and frames and how these develop over time. What does the word appeasement mean to us? Not the dictionary meaning, but the real meaning that has developed since World War II in our political language? Geoff points out that some words, like appeasement, will have sustained associations with certain frames for a very long time. Ken discusses the nature of frames--are they universal and innate, or are they historically contingent? Geoff tries to steer away from the use of frames as a term because of the many "frames" that the word has come to possess.

John, Ken, and Geoff discuss whether or not there is a distinction between dictionary and literal meanings, whether not frames are a necessary evil in a linguistic society, and the nature of language use. Ken next moves the conversation into the contemporary political atmosphere, questioning whether there is something deep to learn from the fact that the right seems to be much more effective than the left at framing important issues. Geoff thinks there are two main components to the right's success: the creation of slick catch phrases like "No Child Left Behind" and the creation of an overarching narrative about the decent heartland and the traditional American spirit. Geoff thinks that too much attention is given to the former catch phrases and not enough to this very successful narrative strategy. John and Ken go on to discuss the symbols that everyday words like value, tradition, and elite have become.

John, Ken, and Geoff answer questions and lead discussions with callers about the different strategies of framing from the American right and left, whether framing distorts reality or whether it is the only reality to speak of, and what can be done to "take back" words that have been negatively framed--is it ever even possible? Are there some words which have been so framed by political or other interests that their real meaning has been completely lost? What is the point of dictionaries anyway? John and Ken discuss these questions and more before reluctantly moving their investigation to the blogosphere.

  • Roving Philosophical Report (Seek to 4:33): Novella Carpenter speaks with George Lakoff, the influential cognitive scientist and linguist from UC Berkeley about George Bush's "Surge" vs. Vietnam's "Escalation" and how frames are created by the left and right in American Politics.
  • 60-Second Philosopher (Seek to 49:25): Ian Shoales burns through George Orwell's life and works as the creator of some of the most important and powerful "frames" in the 20th century.

Get Philosophy Talk


Sunday at 10am, PST, KALW, 91.7 FM, Local Public Radio, San Francisco


Individual Downloads  via CdBaby or Itunes.  Multipacks and The Complete Philosophy Talk via Iamplify

John Perry and Ken Taylor

Continue the Conversation

Sidebar Menu

Upcoming Shows

  • November 29 : Your Lying Eyes - Perception, Memory, and Justice
    The criminal justice system often relies on the testimony of eyewitnesses to get convictions. Yet more and more, psychological science demonstrates...
  • December 6 : Self and Self-Presentation
    We craft personal brands or images to accompany or represent ourselves in various situations. These personas are malleable – how we portray ourselves...
  • December 13 : Taoism: Following the Way
    Taoism (sometimes Daoism) is one of the great philosophical traditions of China. Lao-Tzu, commonly regarded as its founder, said that “Those who know...
  • December 20 : Good, Evil, and the Divine Plan
    A theodicy is an explanation by a philosopher or theologian about why a world created by a kind and all-powerful God contains so much suffering. It...
  • December 27 : Truth and Other Fictions
    Most of us think we know the truth when we see it. But what exactly is truth, anyway? Philosophers have offered a blizzard of different answers,...

Support Philosophy Talk


Philosophy Talk relies on the support of listeners like you to stay on the air and online. Any contribution, large or small, helps us produce intelligent, reflective radio that questions everything, including our most deeply-held beliefs about science, morality, culture, and the human condition. Make your tax-deductible contribution now through Stanford University's secure online donation page. Thank you for your support, and thank you for thinking!