Thinking Like a Conspiracy Theorist

Ray and Blakey open the show with a brief discussion on the nature of conspiracy theories and their proponents. While misinformation seems like an easy problem to address, this opens a rather complex box. We may have to question the truth and biases of news sources, the influence of figures hidden in the background, and the power of institutions.

Ray and Blakey welcome the show’s guest, Christopher French, a professor of psychology at the University of London and co-author of “Anomalistic Psychology: Exploring Paranormal Belief and Experience.” Christopher gives a brief definition on conspiracy theories, emphasizing their lack of conclusive evidence and general narratives of deception hidden from the public. Moreover, these theories tend to evoke a sense of superiority and confirmation biases among their supporters, further fueling their beliefs. Thirdly, Christopher addresses the potential harm theories pose, such as those that deny Covid-19 or climate change.

In the last segment of the show, Christopher delves deeper into addressing conspiracy theorists. He urges listeners to be cautious and respectful in their dialogue with theorists to work towards shared, factual understanding as opposed to unproductive condescension. He additionally considers the distinction between conspiracies which are documented and theoretical, drawing from real world examples.

Roving Philosophical Report (5:44): Sarah Lai Stirland reports on conspiracy theories regarding voter fraud in the presidential election. She draws from news sources, politicians, students, and professors to discuss this narrative and its harmful impact.
Sixty-Second Philosopher (45:50): Ian Shoales reports on the history of conspiracy theories across time and location, signaling their longtime presence in society.