Sunday, April 12, 2009

What is it

There are two ways to have your desires fulfilled: you can either get what you want (if you're lucky enough) or change your desires.  If we can fit our desires to what we have, we're likely to be a lot happier.  So why do we desire things that are out of reach?  Why do we have desires that make us unhappy?  And what can we do about it?  John and Ken explore the relationship between desire and happiness with William Irvine, author of On Desire: Why We Want What We Want, in a program recorded live at the Illahee Institute in Portland, Oregon.

Listening Notes

Why do I want what I want?  Am I really just a slave to pleasure?  Desires cause me to always want more and never be satisfied, so perhaps they’re the source of unhappiness.  But then again could I be happy if I didn’t have desires to fulfill?  John and Ken ponder these questions, and they have expert William Irvine, author of On Desire: Why We Want What We Want, to help them hammer out the answers.  Irvine explains the difference between terminal and instrumental desires, and why following the chain of our desires can produce unexpected results.  William and John join up against Ken to debate whether intellect or passion wins out in motivating our desires and our resulting behaviors.  Find out who agrees with Hume, and who thinks he had it wrong.

Our hosts go on to talk about various schools of thought and how they tell us we can be happy.  The Buddhists have suggestions on desire, as do the Stoics.  Irvine argues for learning to want what we have rather than seeking what we want.  Ken questions this approach, and points out the role of desire in human progress.  If people had been happy with their lot 10,000 years ago, you might not be reading this summary on the internet right now.  Irvine has a response to this, and the debate continues.  Tune in to find out about desire, pleasure, and how one might live the best life.  You’ll also find out why desires are essential to rationality, and why it might be in your best interest to allow yourself to be labeled as crazy.

  • Roving Philosophical Report (seek to 6:15):  Reporter Julie Napolin looks at popular culture to try and get a handle on what we really desire, and how we achieve it.  She and Portland psychologist Peter Armstrong take a critical look at Tony Soprano and his employment of a psychoanalyst to help him sort out his desires, and determine that getting what we want is not necessarily the key to happiness.
     
  • 60-Second Philosopher (seek to 49:30): Ian Shoales asks the age-old question, what do women want?  In an attempt to find the answer, he ponders a study of women’s and men’s arousal when viewing various types of sex.  

Get Philosophy Talk

Radio

Sunday at 10am (pacific) on KALW 91.7 FM Local Public Radio, San Francisco

Podcast

Individual downloads via CDBaby and iTunes. Multipacks and The Complete Philosophy Talk via iAamplify

 

William Irvine, Professor of Philosophy, Wright State University

Bonus Content

 

VIDEO: Watch the complete program

EXTENDED INTERVIEW with Peter Armstrong, President of the Oregon Psychoanalytic Center

Upcoming Shows

26 February 2017

Free Speech on Campus

In the last few years, conservatives and liberals alike have accused activists on college campuses of silencing contrary opinions. Many have argued—...

05 March 2017

Queerness

Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Transsexual… it is safe to say that new ideas of gender and sexuality have broken into mainstream consciousness...

12 March 2017

Art and Obscenity

What do Marcel Duchamp, Damien Hirst, and Andres Serrano have in common? They’ve all created modern works of art that have shocked and outraged the...