Show

Cities, Gentrification, and Inequality

Week of: 
May 8, 2011
What is it: 

In the 1960s, as many American cities burst and burned, the upper and middle classes fled to the suburbs, leaving behind a decaying infrastructure and a socially isolated urban underclass.  In more recent times, many urban centers have undergone re-gentrification, and with it the return of the upper classes, safer neighborhoods, and better services.  But gentrification often drives poor and working class people from the very places they had called home.  Is gentrification on balance a morally and socially good thing or bad thing?  Does it serve more to increase inequality or to lessen the isolation of the urban underclass?  John and Ken assess the moral cityscape with Stanford sociologist Frederic Stout, co-editor of The City Reader.

Listening Notes: 

It’s a word that stirs strong emotions. Depending on whom you talk to, it might evoke anger, guilt or defensiveness. “Gentrification” is often defined as an influx of well-to-do, young, Anglo-American people into a predominantly non-Anglo-American and poor neighborhood, driving up rent and food prices, and driving out the previous inhabitants. Yet is that a fair and balanced picture? Does gentrification pit the needs of the less well off against the wants of better off? Or can it help an entire neighborhood redevelop? Is gentrification on balance a morally good or bad thing? John and Ken turn to Frederic Stout, lecturer in Urban Studies at Stanford University and co-editor of “The City Reader,” to help answer that question.

Frederic tells us why we ought to question the common picture of gentrification. First of all, he notes, the middle-class seems caught in a popular opinion trap: They have been villainized in history classes for leaving in 60s (so-called “white-flight”) and now they are vilified for coming back to cities. He also tells us that typically it’s not the people moving in who do the displacing, but city planners, through re-zoning and occasionally full-scale demolition of a neighborhood.

Frederic gives us the model he personally prefers to use to think about gentrification. He sees what happens in cities as a struggle between the government elite, the free-market, and communities. Most policy, he claims, conforms to the demands of government and the market, and he thinks communities need to take a more active role. Specifically, he believes communities should see themselves as social entrepreneurs, possessing a collection of assets they can use to negotiate with the government and the market.

Frederic also defends the “gentrifiers.” He sees them as the new employees of a new economy— the “creative class”—moving into neighborhoods where aging members of the industrial economy live. In short, gentrification is a result of demographic shifts in age and structural changes in the economy.

The last section of the conversation turns to how to help make sure gentrification occurs in the best possible way, creating neighborhoods that are integrated, diverse and economically thriving. While there is no one right answer, Frederic presents several considerations to take into account. We’ll leave the rest to you, the listeners.

  • Roving Philosophical Reporter (seek to 3:59): Caitlin Esch investigates an example of gentrification taking place right here, right now in the Bay Area, in the Oakland neighborhood of Temescal. 
  • 60 Second Philosopher (seek to 49:38): Ian Shoales finds gentrification in an unlikely place: Williston, North Dakota, where oil extraction has brought in money and strained infrastructure.  

Frederic Stout, Lecturer in Urban Studies, Stanford University

Related Resources: 

Books

Brown-Saracino, Japonica. (2010) The Gentrification Debates: A Reader.

Freeman, Lance (2006). There Goes the Hood: Views of Gentrification from the Ground Up.

Legates, Richard and Stout, Frederic, eds. (2011). The City Reader, fifth edition.

Reed, Ishmael (2003). Blues City: A Walk in Oakland.

Web

Dot, M. “Gentrification has Nothing to Do with White Hipsters.” Racialicious. Apr. 24, 2009.

Haas, Gilda. “Inequality, Gentrification, and the Right to the City,” PeaceWork Magazine.  Feb. 2009.

Knauss, Dan. “Gentrification: Artists and Yuppies Working Together,” Riverwestcurrents. Jul. 2002

Woo, Stu. “Oakland’s Temescal Goes From Run-Down to Reborn,” The Wall Street Journal.  Dec. 3 2009.

Get Philosophy Talk

Radio

Sunday at 10am (pacific) on KALW 91.7 FM Local Public Radio, San Francisco

Podcast

Individual downloads via CDBaby and iTunes. Multipacks and The Complete Philosophy Talk via iAamplify

John Perry and Ken Taylor

Continue the Conversation

Sidebar Menu

Upcoming Shows

  • May 1 : One Child Too Many
    The United Nations predicts human population growth will surpass 9 billion around 2050. We know the consequences of overpopulation have the potential...
  • May 8 : Affirmative Action - Too Little or Too Much?
    Addressing our nation’s history of racial injustice can be a truly backbreaking endeavor. Race-based affirmative action is usually thought of as one...
  • May 15 : When Is It Wrong to Save a Life? Lessons from the Trolley Problem
    A trolley is approaching a track junction, and you happen to be standing by the switch. If you do nothing, the trolley will kill a number of innocent...
  • May 22 : Altered States
    Aldous Huxley explains his conception of the brain as a "reducing valve" of consciousness in his provocative book, The Doors of Perception...
  • May 29 : The Moral Lives of Animals
    From Aristotle and Kant to Hume and Darwin, philosophers and scientists have long denied the idea that animals are capable of acting for moral...

Support Philosophy Talk

DONATE TODAY

Philosophy Talk relies on the support of listeners like you to stay on the air and online. Any contribution, large or small, helps us produce intelligent, reflective radio that questions everything, including our most deeply-held beliefs about science, morality, culture, and the human condition. Make your tax-deductible contribution now through Stanford University's secure online donation page. Thank you for your support, and thank you for thinking!