 |
| Topic: |
| Audio: |
|

Download |
|

Listen
Online |
REPLACE 'YYMMDD'
|
| Guest: |

David
Weinberger, Fellow, Berkman Center for Internet and Society,
Harvard Law School
|
| What
is it? |
“We’re just never
going to catch up,”
writes David Weinberger in Everything
Is
Miscellaneous. That
is, we're never
going to catch up with the flood of information that is thrown at us by
modern
technology, especially the internet.
We
can never get all of our email filed, our digital pictures labeled, our
calendars updated, our computers organized.
Is the problem too much information, or
out-of-date expectations about
how information should be organized?
Ken
and John try to make sense of the flood of information with author and
philosopher David Weinberger. |
Listening Notes
John and Ken begin by challenging their guest on his book title:
‘Everything is Miscellaneous’. Is everything really
miscellaneous? Can everything really fit into the
‘there’s-no-right-category-for-this’ category?
David Weinberger says yes – anything and everything is
miscellaneous; there is no one right way of classifying information, no
inherent ordering of information in the world. The only classifications
are those we project onto the world. But, he emphasizes, that does mean
that there are not some orderings that are better than others, given
the particular purposes of those organizing. David, Ken and John bring
in some real world examples to help them sort through the complexities
of the problem.
In the next section, Ken asks David whether the internet is really that
great of an aid to the informationally-challenged: the internet can
give us information on anything, but the information is often not
sorted or filtered by authorities on the subject matter. At least at
libraries we knew that the information we got, and categorizations
thereof, was tried and true; now all we have is the new. David reminds
Ken that we haven’t lost old libraries, ways of classifying, or
authorities, we have gained new ones.
Ken, John, and David discuss pragmaticism and more of the costs and
benefits of having new options: we can better sort the world according
to our individual interests, one the on hand, but on the other hand, if
each person sorts information in different ways, we may lose the
conventions that help us communicate.
The last segment starts off with a caller who reminds Ken, John and
David, that there are some things that just don’t belong together
– no matter who is interested in what. David disagrees, but they
all launch into a discussion about authorities in classification in the
modern digital age. Even if there is no single way of classifying
information, maybe some are better than others. But in the digital age,
people aren’t forced to listen to any ‘authorities’
on classification: if you think a piece of information is important,
you they can find someone to agree with you, and it becomes easy to
call authorities those who agree with you. Despite David’s steady
commitment to the wonders of information technology through the
show, he ends off the by noting that this repercussion is worthy
of worry, not wonder.
- 60-second Philosopher
(seek to 49:35): Ian Schoales investigates Facebook: is it only a
clever ploy for spying on us? He explores DARPA, overlapping
personnel, and Facebook’s privacy policy.
Additional Resources
Online Resources
Books

|
|