| back to Past Shows |
![]() Notes on show: Original Airdate 08/08/2006 |
|||||||||||||
About
the Guest
Elizabeth Kiss was Nannerl O. Keohane Director of the Kenan Institute and associate professor of the practice of political science and philosophy at Duke University, and the author of many books on ethnic conflict and global human rights. She has recently been named president of Agnes Scott College. Listening
Notes
John and Ken begin by introducing the Oregonian listeners who came out to this live taping of Philosophy Talk and thanking them for their continued dedication to the show. When discussing the topics of Race, Class, and Inequality, it may be easier to talk about what philosophical issues are not involved rather than enumerating those that are. Nevertheless, John and Ken try to frame the discussion by talking primarily about economic and political inequality, although John wonders whether or not any other kinds of equalities are possible without economic equality to begin with. John warns against over-generalization, but agrees with Ken that wealth tracking with things like race causes serious problems. John and Ken discuss whether or not some economic inequality is okay, concluding that as long as certain fundamental qualities of life are insured it may be. Ken
introduces Elizabeth Kiss, the Nannerl O. Heohane Director of the Kenan
Institute at Duke University, author of many works on human rights and
ethnic conflict around the world. John mentions that Americans pride
themselves on being the most egalitarian country in the world, and asks
Elizabeth if this pride is well-founded. Elizabeth sadly reveals that
there are huge gaps between the rich and poor in the United States, and
that unfortunately these categories are drawn along racial lines, a
recent example of this growing gap is the aftermath of Hurricane
Katrina. Elizabeth Kiss uses the example of Hurricane Katrina to
discuss our country's moral imagination, and how natural disasters can
reveal more underlying class tensions in American life. John discusses
a kind of equality of humanity which allows us to relate to be what its
like to be in other peoples' shoes, and notes that in American we have
not been able to do so.
Ken
returns the conversation to the distinction between economic and
political equality, asking the guest if it is possible to have
political equality without economic equality. Elizabeth Kiss believes
that in this situation one can have formal equality--or equality on the
books or by law--but not real active or effective equality, the kind
which makes one feel in control and able to change ones life. She
believes that the myth of the American Dream or rags to riches is
mostly just mythical in this day and age. John discusses the equality
of aspirations, or the equal access to possibilities and dreams, and
Ken points out the practical difficulties of trying to guarantee such
abstract notions of equality.
Ken
gives examples to try to understand the underlying reasons for
equality. If life is a race, and I run it well and win in the end, why
should I care about other people who were not as successful? Elizabeth
Kiss points out that it's not a fair competition, and that while it is
hard to recognize this from the winner's perspective, we do not all
start from the same place, invalidating the simple race analogy. She
believes that the American ideal of equality of opportunity is really
not being pursued through the current infrastructure, and that the
reason people should care about such systematic inequity is because it
wastes a very large amount of human potential. Playing the devil's
advocate, Ken points out that many people think that society is on
average fair, that those in jail broke the law, those that are poor are
lazy, and those that are successful work hard--trying to push the guest
for a more direct argument. Elizabeth describes an experiment she has
her students perform where they visit a food bank and learn how little
many families have to spend on food each day, a revelatory experience
for those that don't understand what it's like.
Audience
members discuss their own views and life experiences with the guest,
ranging from the growing numbers of white poor to the moral imagination
of fellow americans and how that could achieve a different and more
equitable society. John, Ken, and Elizabeth discuss ways in which the
moral background from across the political spectrum can be used to
improve the lives of the poor. In his closing remarks John stresses the
role of philosophy, imagination, and leadership in creating a more
egalitarian society.
Additional
Resources
|
||||||||||||||
| ©
2004 Philosophy Talk Productions. All rights reserved. Created by Whitetail Web Design. |