 |
| Topic: |
| Audio: |
|

Download |
|

Listen
Online |
REPLACE 'YYMMDD'
|
| Guest: |

Margaret Boden,
Research Professor of Cognitive Science, University of Sussex
|
| What
is it? |
What
makes
an idea or work of art creative? Can
creativity be measured? Can
a computer
be creative? What
is the relationship
between creativity and consciousness? John and Ken explore their
creative sides
with Margaret Boden from the University of Sussex, author of The
Creative Mind:
Myths and Mechanisms. |
Listening
Notes
Ken and John begin the conversation by questioning whether creativity
can be understood scientifically. Creativity begins in the brain, so if
we study the brain scientifically, can’t we study creativity
scientifically? But creativity seems to be more than a matter of
brain waves. Ken and John look forward to talking to Margaret Boden, a
world-renowned expert on creativity.
Ken and John discuss with Margaret why she became interested in
creativity. She tells them that, next to consciousness, she sees
creativity as one of the most challenging phenomena to make sense of in
a materialistic framework. Ken and John then ask Margaret how she
defines creativity, and they discuss the difference between novelty and
progress. Margaret tells them why it is that, if they want to keep this
distinction, that they have to relent on the search for a science of
creativity in the full sense of ‘science’.
In the next section, Margaret, Ken and John take up where they left
off: why can’t computers be fully creative – even if they
can come up with the same new combinations of old material as
‘creative’ humans would? Margaret, Ken and John continue to
explore the differences and similarities between what
‘creative’ humans can do and what computers can do: who is
better at what, why, and what can be done about it. Margaret reminds
them that the gap between what computers do do now, and what they may
be able to do, one day, is wide. In response to the urging of a caller,
they wonder whether similar results between human creative efforts and
computer activities can tell us anything about the similarity in how
those results were achieved: is the essence of creativity in the
product or way of coming up with the product?
In the last section, Ken, John, and Margaret discuss ways to encourage
creativity. Many creative geniuses have been anti-social, unfriendly,
unpleasant people. Is there any way to be creative and be a pleasant
human being? Margaret reminds them that creative ideas comes largely
from putting together old ideas in new ways, which means creative
people need some exposure to the ‘old’ ideas of the common
folk’ – which means they need some decent interaction with
normal humans. Margaret, Ken, and John end by discussing the varieties
and requirements of creative genius, and revisiting their earlier
distinction between the new and the truly valuable creative.
- Roving Philosophical
Reporter (seek
to 5:30): Julie ventures to the Digital Center for New Media and Art,
an engineering lab in Berkeley, where scientists and artists take small
unfelt changes in earth’s movements and turn them into music.
Julie investigate how technology, the earth, and human creativity
can combine to form beautiful art.
- 60-second Philosopher
(seek to 49:40): Ian Schoales explores the divergent social responses
to seemingly similar phenomena: forgery and plagiarism. The
former often gets cut slack, the latter does not. Does this have to
with the different creative requirements of these two activities?
Additional
Resources
Online Resources
Books

|
|