Simone de Beauvoir

Comments's picture
Submitted by on March 16, 2014

Thank you, Philosophy Talk, for a fascinating podcast on Simone de Beauvoir with Shannon Musset and for the essay above by Laura Maguire. 

Regarding the critique of second-wave feminism by the third-wave for its supposed focus upon white middle-class women, it could be argued that any specific movement for the freedom of human potential (eg, the civil rights movement, the gay-rights movement, etc) is exclusive.

As Laura suggests, paraphrasing de Beauvoir, the larger human-potential movement really entails the life of anyone who is arbitrarily forced to be " 'other' in any world where you’re constantly taught that you’re second class" . . . for any given pretext.

So all of these constructs, "woman," "gay," "black," etc are in a sense ways of reinforcing the power & dominance of the white male.

To quote one of the women in the documentary film "Salt of the Earth," about a 1954 New Mexico miner's strike, whose struggle with her husband amidst the group's struggle against the mine management, "Do you still think you can have dignity only if I have none? … Do you feel better having someone lower than you? Whose neck shall I stand on to make me feel superior? … I want to rise and push everything up as I go."

I think this quote perfectly illustrates the internal, intra-psychic dynamic which drives oppression of all kinds, and it speaks to what I have said elsewhere on this blog about male emotion being a very powerful force, irrationally squelching progress and the contributions of others because of their gender, sexuality, or race.

Thank you again for stimulating thinking!'s picture
Submitted by on March 17, 2014

Correction: The 1954 film "Salt of the Earth" is not a documentary; it's a dramatization. It anticipates both the feminist movement and the Chicano rights movement.

May be a diversion from the current topic, but here's a link to a recent story about the film:

MJA's picture
Submitted by MJA on March 16, 2014

Freedom and Truth

If you are still searching for the truth or One's true self, study Nature and remove any thoughts of faith, uncertainty or doubt. Enlightenment is this Way. Underneath it All is just you. 

As for freedom: if you think you have a grasp of it, let go!  =

Tim Smith's picture
Submitted by Tim Smith on March 18, 2014

There is an elephant in the blog/show/chat regarding Simone de Beauvoir.  I lurked in the chat but couldn't type out my questions to my satisfaction.  It takes a blind person to describe an elephant so let me give this a whack.  

Philosophy has a problem with women.   Thinkers need to right that ship - fix that problem - but Beauvoir is not the peg to hang that hat on.

Simone de Beauvoir was deeply flawed as a person.  Her relationship with Sartre is interesting to say the least and disturbing if one must say anything more about it.  This show took the tack of saying the least and that is the first part of the elephant I would touch upon.

De Beauvoir was a sexual predator of a selective cadre of her students.  She along with Sartre sexually entwined these young students using their role as philosopher and teacher in what I would consider bad faith but to them, in the time, was good fun.  The sexual politic of these liasons is as troubling as is the use of sexual politic to begin with perhaps.  I do agree that Simone should not simply be defined by her romantic liasons - but there is no attempt at complexity by skirting them as this show did.  The benefit of this ignorance is  a closer look at the philosophy of de Beauvoir which is another part of the elephant that I would touch upon.

Ken and Shannon had a nice exchange about the differences between Sartre's radical freedom and de Beauvoir's more complex and, I think, realistic understanding of roles, real life choices and her own concept of existential freedom.  De Beauvoir's philosophy was different from Sartre's.  I credit this show in helping me come to think about this difference.  It makes the purported lack of disagreement between Jean Paul and Simone vexing.  There is something troubling in the harmonious companionship of Sartre and de Beauvior.  A conversation was not had that should have been between these two philosophical giants about radical freedom and circumstance.  I would have liked to hear Dr. Musset discuss that.  De Beauvoir took the "other" side in her relation with Sartre and I'm wondering if that  first of all is true and secondly if she changed much in her later life - I'm sure there is biography I could read on that point.

Finally one last piece of elephant not touched on too well in the chat or show is the preponderance of what I think to be good science in gender studies and sexuality since The Second Sex came out.  It's interesting that it shared the bookstore shelf with the Kinsey Reports in its initial publication.  Not that I take that to be sound science, but I do think these discussions started the path to liberation and equality that we are still walking.  I take John's point that men are being feminized much more than women are taking on the roles of the "First" sex.   At the heart of this role reversal is the fact that men and women are not from Mars and Venus.  I would like to have heard the science to get a feel for the long lasting relevance of de Beauvoir's projects.

As it is I don't think I know how to take this show.  I had and still have different views on Simone de Beauvoir as a philosopher and mind...and I might be worse off than before the show in grasping her legacy.  That is probably a good thing.



Laura Maguire's picture
Submitted by Laura Maguire on April 11, 2014

Wow! Thanks for the great comments!

Tim, there's a lot to digest there, but very informative. It's a pity you didn't join in on the chat with Shannon.
Harold G. Neuman's picture
Submitted by Harold G. Neuman on March 2, 2016

Average people, with whom I have daily contact and cordial conversation, are mostly ambivalent about philosophy and, usually, disinterested in any sort of philosophizing whatsoever. They simply do not see how any of it has a meaningful place in their lives, much less how even a few of their friends and acquaintances might be interested in something so, well, philosophical. Science? Now that is a different story altogether. Most everyone I know is terminally infatuated with information technology and its role in making their lives easier; responses to circumstances faster; and safety and security immeasurably improved. We have been socially engineered and culturally controlled for several centuries and more recent developments have only accelerated and streamlined this process. So, looking at the big picture, including the radicalization of change itself, it is not so surprising to see the questioning of traditional roles and rejection of antiquated customs which were always about maintaining status quo. DeBeauvoir's morality (or failings thereof) are peripheral to any objective discussion of her philosophy, as would be those of Sartre, seems to me. Their contributions to the world of philosophy are more significant than any of our possible objections to their personal behavior(s).

I came very late to an appreciation of and interest in philosophy-mostly for the reasons stated at the beginning of these comments. But, in the fullness of time, I acquired an intuition that was socially and culturally impossible for me as a much younger person. One achieves a different level of consciousness when one chooses to stray from the confines and comforts of the herd. Sooner or later, though, some sort of dissatisfaction with the status quo propels us to seek something more than grass and water. Kudos to you, Laura. Terrific job!

Harold G. Neuman 

Gary M Washburn's picture
Submitted by Gary M Washburn on March 6, 2016

For a review of existentialist sexual morality, see the movie Amigo. Good for a laugh.

It seem a bit fatuous to complain about violations of moral convention when the whole point is a rejection of them. But even in this light such complaints are unfair. Sartre made a career of demonstrating that moral values could no longer be based in obedience to some pre-determining moral law. Personal responsibility is paramount. Such a moral view is hardly likely to be gratuitous or wanton. The protagonist (I will not say "hero") of Cherche Longtemps (In Search of Lost Time) may have loved and left, but Sartre and Beauvoir made responsibility the central theme of their social relations. Sartre did have an affair with one of his students (something considered untoward but not immoral) and then with her sister, but he supported both until they were otherwise cared for (at a time when a woman could not reasonably be expected to support herself).

Is it possible to have a morality founded on the principle of radical responsibility? It could be said that both Sartre and Beauvoir failed. But they, like all others before them, regarded freedom as a personal property, rather than a response enabled by the act of rigor of another. If the most rigorous term is the loss of its antecedent determinant or guide, the freedom that results is most articulate as responsibility, of the worth of that loss being recognized, enabled in those of us in place to respond. It is a subversive process that is covert to any a priori or pre-determining terms or authority. The gods cannot be privy to their own demise! Hence the difficulty in explaining it.

Gary M Washburn's picture
Submitted by Gary M Washburn on March 7, 2016

I think that comes under the category of 'true, but uninteresting'.

In an unpublished novel by an unrecognized author, there is a scene in which a philosophy professor in a small community college is teaching logic to aspiring technocrats. He brings the lesson to a point where the failings of the whole logical system become apparent, and tries to explain to the class how this lapse in the logical/technological edifice actually opens the way for a more human presence central to the real, and, of course, proceeds to bring in all sorts of existential and moral issues. The class responds in outrage that they are wasting their time on vapid themes that they cannot see as furthering their career aims.

Gary M Washburn's picture
Submitted by Gary M Washburn on March 9, 2016

I'm assuming no such thing. And as a (largely) self-taught thinker myself I sympathize with your plaint. But what the academy does do is assure a comprehensive review of available material. There was a time when college was affordable, and it could be again. The professors do not set tuition rates, and most of them earn a lot less than was once usual. Most instruction in higher education is now conducted by "adjuncts", or teachers without a contract or any of the usual prerogatives so lavishly loathed by you and others. But you and those others forget that the these "luxuries" were at their height at a time when college was readily affordable.

The suggestion of a Sanders/Trump or Trump/Sanders ticket makes me doubt you sanity, and hopelessly confuses your political message. But it gives me the opportunity to put in my two cents about the great mystery of Trump "success" (with less than a third of voting Republicans, or, less than seven percent of eligible Americans). The use of brazen racial innuendo convinces white males that their feudal overlords are really on their side. But the notion that T. Rump (THE Rump, more joker than wild-card) is going to DC to shout "You're Fired!" at everyone is just fatuous. He offers mania, but would, if he could be elected, provide only depression. As for Clinton, I am leery of a nominee that only wins in states that the Democrats will not win in November. But a Clinton/Warren ticket, with a placated Sanders, could be the answer here. But no president can substitute for a lack of public representation in Congress. Electoral reform is the real answer.

As for Beauvoir (the nominal subject of this thread) it is not unusual for the avant-garde to be seen as anachronism by the time it becomes a publicly familiar theme. That's not her fault. I have not focused a lot on her work because there is little in it of philosophical interest that Sartre did not originate and elaborate more fully. I think it a dereliction on the part of current philosophy to be so dismissive of existentialism, though I also think that the existentialists were bit derelict themselves in presuming much too much in their terms, which fall flat upon closer examination. Contingent can mean exigent (imminence), as well as immanence. And it is not at all clear which they intended or why they do not clarify this. The point is, existence is the proven term that the logical hermeticity of antecedence and conclusion simply does not explain the real. And it is the human, not the divine, nor bloodless number, which supplies the deficit.

Meanwhile, Mr. Videla, I cannot figure out whether you are with the feudal overlords or with the people.

Gary M Washburn's picture
Submitted by Gary M Washburn on March 9, 2016

BGI Barclays Global Investors
BGI Bainbridge Graduate Institute
BGI Bureau Gravimétrique International
BGI Borland Graphic Interface (File Name Extension)
BGI Bridgetown, Barbados - Grantley Adams International (Airport Code)
BGI Baelen Gaillard Industries (France)
BGI Binary Gateway Interface
BGI Brugmansia Growers International
BGI Baltic Group International
BGI Battle Group Interoperability
BGI Borders Group Incorporated (bookstore)
BGI Beta Gamma Incinerator
BGI Belgian Graphic Interface (Belgium; est. 1991)
BGI Bordeaux Gironde Investissement (French investment agency; Bordeaux, France)
BGI Bibliographie Géographique Internationale (French: International Geographical Bibliography; database)
BGI Bioservices Group Inc (North Bay, ON, Canada)
BGI Bretagne Géothermie Installation (French: Brittany Geothermal Installation; Brittany, France)
BGI Bormans Grafische Industrie (Dutch: Bormans Printing Industry; Belgium)
BGI Basic Ground Instructor (certification; US FAA)
BGI Bandai Games, Inc. (video games)
BGI Budget Group, Inc. (automobiles)
BGI Bost Garnache Industrie SA (French tool manufacturing company)


Add a comment

Log in or register to post comments

Get Philosophy Talk


Sunday at 10am (pacific) on KALW 91.7 FM Local Public Radio, San Francisco


Individual downloads via CDBaby and iTunes. Multipacks and The Complete Philosophy Talk via iAamplify

Recent Featured Blogs

  • Do We Live in a Multiverse?

    In one sense it’s pretty clear we live in a multiverse.  Well, throughout human history, every time we think we know what the universe is, it turns out that there is not just one of those things, but a lot of them.

    October 21, 2016 | 5 comments | Read More »
  • The Dark Side of the Cosmos

    Here’s an astounding fact. If you take all of the ordinary objects you can see, from tables and chairs to all the stars and planets in the universe, you will have accounted for less than 5% of the universe’s total mass-energy. The other 95%? That’s invisible stuff like dark matter and dark energy.

    October 7, 2016 | 17 comments | Read More »
  • Trust and Mistrust

    Trust is a pattern of reliance that is no doubt essential to social life. But is it rational? Does trust really amount to being stupid, or helpless, or both?

    September 27, 2016 | 15 comments | Read More »
  • Dewey's Democracy

    “Democracy is the worst form of government, except for all the others…. The best argument against democracy is a five-minute conversation with the average voter.”  -Winston Churchil

    September 23, 2016 | 14 comments | Read More »
  • Magical Thinking

    How do you simultaneously cut taxes, increase spending, and balance the budget? All it takes is a little magical thinking.

    September 18, 2016 | 8 comments | Read More »